By Thomas C. Brickhouse
Socrates' ethical psychology is broadly considered 'intellectualist' within the experience that, for Socrates, each moral failure to do what's top is completely the results of a few cognitive failure to understand what's top. until eventually book of this e-book, the view that, for Socrates, feelings and needs haven't any function to play in inflicting such failure went unchallenged. This e-book argues opposed to the orthodox view of Socratic intellectualism and gives as a substitute a accomplished replacement account that explains why Socrates believed that feelings, wants and appetites can impression human motivation and result in errors. Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith safeguard the research of Socrates' philosophy and supply an alternate interpretation of Socratic ethical psychology. Their novel account of Socrates' perception of advantage and the way it truly is received indicates that Socratic ethical psychology is significantly extra refined than students have intended
Read Online or Download Socratic Moral Psychology PDF
Best ethics & morality books
You are going to cross right into a Barnes and Noble and spot on a table an indication raised which reads "thought-provoking. " normally the table inhabits atheist schedule and nonsense, which the informal reader is often tempted to ask yourself approximately, although the proficient reader regularly deplores. this can be a ebook - this can be an writer - that merits the name "thought-provoking.
During this quantity prime overseas environmental philosophers extra the controversy concerning the price of nature, the concept that of our surroundings, and the metaphysical, moral, social and foreign implications of those options. Philosophers need to a point ignored the examine of nature and the average setting, and this assortment not just offers a long-overdue contribution to that research, but in addition issues to inadequacies of a lot modern moral and political concept.
A lot feminist scholarship has considered Catholicism and Shi'i Islam as non secular traditions that, traditionally, have greeted feminist claims with skepticism or outright hostility. inventive Conformity demonstrates how yes liberal secular assumptions approximately those spiritual traditions are just partially right and, extra importantly, deceptive.
This e-book promotes the unique thought of “Moral Capital” because the key to examining the character and serve as of morality in fiscal actions. The publication is split into 3 significant sections. within the first, the writer argues that the logical connections among morality and economic climate and people among morality and revenue supply a concrete theoretical foundation for the concept that of ethical capital.
- The Philosophical and Theological Foundations of Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Theory and its Relation to Religious Belief
- Plato on Justice and Power: Reading Book 1 of Plato’s Republic
- Ethics after Aristotle
- Moral Aggregation
- Ethics at the Beginning of Life: A phenomenological critique
Extra info for Socratic Moral Psychology
It seems that critics of Socratic studies are not themselves able to agree about which ancient genre we should assign Plato’s Socratic dialogues to. Of course, we are inclined to count this as evidence against any claim that genre considerations require us to abandon the assumptions of Socratic studies. 15 16 26 Socratic Moral Psychology tropes they regard as central to the relevant genre. Instead, they find many of the ordinary conventions missing altogether, and many others “transposed” (de Stryker and Slings 1994: 34).
In recent years, many scholars have engaged in a kind of procedural approach that might actually have its basis in the interpretive requirement we have been considering. A number of very fine books and journal articles have advanced our knowledge of Plato by focusing deeply on one work and seeking to interpret it with as little recourse or reference to any of Plato’s other works as possible. Not only do we find nothing wrong with such efforts, we have often found a great deal right with them. After all, even if those engaged in what we are calling Socratic studies are right to think that a certain group of dialogues have deep philosophical commonalities and affinities, it remains true that the works within this group are different works, and also true that each one deserves individual attention and reflection.
And it is not only modern scholars who fall victim to this illusion. 19 Kahn’s explanation for Aristotle’s error is that Aristotle “arrived on the scene too late; he was separated from Socrates by the dazzling screen of Plato’s portrayal” (1996: 87). Kahn, then, is, in effect, claiming that he understands Plato’s intentions better than Aristotle did! In the first place, Kahn’s analysis ignores the fact that Aristotle would have been in an excellent position to question others who knew the historical Socrates and who knew how well Plato characterized the views of his great predecessor.
Socratic Moral Psychology by Thomas C. Brickhouse